KawasakiTrax Community

Tech Information => General Help => Topic started by: Scottyboy on December 01, 2014, 10:17:15 PM

Title: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Scottyboy on December 01, 2014, 10:17:15 PM
Is anyone using after market air breathers instead of the stock air boxes. I understand you can put on a K&N filter instead. Any recommendations?
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on December 02, 2014, 05:41:24 AM
   No K & N Filters if you are running stock powerjet/econojet Mikuni carbs.  The fuel metering systems needs some vacuum (airbox) to be effective.  If you run standard main jets you are fine to use pods, k & n's or velocity stacks...   you will just need to re-jet "richer".  I don't think my 79' 340 used the econojet carbs.  Someone else on here will have to confirm what type of carbs the 340 used.   The econojet setup used two jets that shared the responsibility for top end fuel metering.  The standard Mikuni carbs used on the main jet to deliver fuel on top.
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Joel on December 02, 2014, 06:08:15 AM
From the factory it would have been the 32mm Econo-jet carb. Joel
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: rminier on December 02, 2014, 06:39:54 AM
Pretty sure the 340 Invader came from the factory with standard Mikuni's...the 440 Intruder and 440 Invader had Power "Econo" jet carbs. It seems most everyone (from a variety of brands using the Power Jet carbs) discourage removing the stock airbox. Regular Mikuni's often can be used with pod type filters....just jet BIG (compared to stock jets) and start RICH and move down from there. Pod type filters will typically allow more air flow than stock airboxes.
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on December 02, 2014, 07:02:02 AM
  So Scotty...  to answer your question, find out if your carbs are standard Mikunis or Econojet Style and then you will know what direction to go.  Hope all this info was helpful!
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: kawhead on December 02, 2014, 08:14:30 AM
std 340 vader carb is the 32 std mik....power jet carbs need the vacuum from the airbox to work correctly....imo the std airbox will not restict a 340
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: rickbmac on January 04, 2015, 05:15:10 PM
As I also have a 79 340 Invader...  Is the answer that I wil need to change the jets if I plan to omit the  airbox?  The specs say that the 440 has the 36mm econo-jet Mikunis and the 340 has std 32mm Mikunis
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on January 04, 2015, 05:57:39 PM
Yes, I would start with main jets two sizes richer than stock if you are going to pull the box.  You can always jet down (lean) if your plug readings show over rich.  You want to see chocolate brown to light tan.  I like "mocha" myself. 8)
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: rickbmac on January 04, 2015, 06:55:09 PM
Thanks,

Purchased the sled yesterday. It is my first Kawasaki and I have not been working on 2strokes that long and all I have worked on are fans.  I do know that I need to make sure engine is not running to lean.

Have seen others running without airbox, but not all.  If the airbox should stay...  I will not chance it if the changes will not increase power or decrease weight.
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on January 05, 2015, 04:21:02 AM
IMO leave the air box on...   no power improvement (to speak of) on that motor.  Also, don't forget you will need to increase your pilot jets.  I pulled the air box on my 82' Liquifire running "open" velocity stacks and had to increase my pilots from 40's to 47.5's.  You change one thing...  it effects many others...   just like building an engine for a drag car.  Torque converter changes, gear changes, etc. 

As a side note...  the Liquifire engine is not stock, so air box removal was beneficial in that case.  Running larger carbs, high compression heads...  you get the idea.  Good luck!       Tory
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Lloyd (ljm) on January 05, 2015, 04:37:35 AM


 Tory

 Are you running Invader heads on your Liquifire?  Shaved or stock?

Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on January 05, 2015, 05:35:49 AM
Invader heads milled and reworked squish (not just shaved).   38mm mics, gearing change and Sportfire helix.  180 psi (w/Klotz octane booster).  Big bottom end performance improvement.
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on January 05, 2015, 05:37:21 AM
Stock porting (I just smoothed out the port casting flaws).
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Lloyd (ljm) on January 05, 2015, 07:27:20 AM


What are you running for a clutch?  Stock HSR ignition and timing?
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: Tory944 on January 05, 2015, 08:22:14 AM
TR800...   stock electronics...   advance timing 2-3 deg.
Title: Re: Air breather substitute for 340 Invader
Post by: jimvw57 on January 07, 2015, 11:41:52 AM
The stock airbox has a built in restriction. If you run without it, sled will run lean. Also using pods will allow snow to get sucked onto them and you run out of air. Most people that have tried running without airbox end up putting it back in place.