Author Topic: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?  (Read 6734 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Johnny speed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« on: April 20, 2014, 11:16:58 AM »
79 Invader secondary bushing feels very loose when I slide the moveable sheave onto the jack shaft !  Are these bushings still available? part # 92028-3004 , Yamaha secondary almost fit but splines did not fit! Thanks for any help

Tory944

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • Torys Vintage Sleds
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2014, 03:37:58 PM »
...  a word from my experience...  I have replaced both the large and small bushings in the Kawi secondaries w/factory bushings...  even after the new replacements the large bushing has plenty of wiggle.   I had a machine shop press in the bushing and he commented that there wasn't much difference between the one I replaced and the new one.  I suspect the tolerance is not tight from the factory.  These were OEM bushings.  If you'd like to try OEM for yourself, call Image Enterprises (Bob) and I think he still has them.   715-479-7427.         Tory

IMO...   If you'd like to see a tighter tolerance I'd find another source for bushings or have some made closer to spec.
Torys Vintage Sleds
Website:  torysvintagesleds.com

Johnny speed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2014, 07:51:14 PM »
Thanks Tory, the big one is fine- its the small one that rides on the jackshaft that has a lot of play!

kawhead

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2014, 08:01:30 AM »
when that ones bad check your shaft for taper.....and it will sometimes break the coupler....

Johnny speed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2014, 05:38:44 PM »
Jackshaft mic's the same all across the secondary end-slightly less then 1" , outer end bushing is good that rides on the (coupler)? All good except the inner on jackshaft!

Tory944

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • Torys Vintage Sleds
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #5 on: April 22, 2014, 06:58:41 AM »
  I know this probably isn't what you want to hear, but do you have another jackshaft??  You know where I am going with this... Always good to keep a few spares of everything.  You know, you feel like you are doing yourself a favor by "cleaning up the yard" until you need that part you tossed...  then you pull your hair out and kick yourself for tossing it.  I've never had a problem with excessive small bushing "play".  Because of its size (high wear) the larger bushing most generally tends to be the problem.  If you have a "loose" jacksaft for parts you could check your tolerance before installing in the sled.  I am sure there are some Kawi guys on here who could line you up with another jackshaft if you were interested in going that route (including myself).  Good luck!   Tory
Torys Vintage Sleds
Website:  torysvintagesleds.com

Johnny speed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2014, 10:45:12 AM »
We have some really good swap meets in the fall in this area and I could pick up the whole secondary , jackshaft , etc. then.

Johnny speed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2014, 12:50:47 PM »
Tory, my buddy has a 75 Sno Twister that runs great but falls off at the top end, titened secondary spring 1/3 turn-great hole shot but still falls flat up top , suspect the new aftermarket cdi? He does not like it when we line up and he gets the hole shot but l fly by on my 76 liquid Nitro! My lnvader starts bogging after warm and always got smoked when we line up-l just got another stator in it and need to button up and set timing yet then l think the invader will be a contender!

Johnny speed

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2014, 08:23:05 PM »
I checked tonite and the jack shaft measures .980 from the bearing out to the end of  the shaft including the spline

Tory944

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • Torys Vintage Sleds
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2014, 05:45:08 AM »
...  It doesn't take much for there to be slop with the bushings.  You might be surprised from one jackshaft to the next.  Sometimes past owners will clean the shafts by media blasting or sanding to clean em' up and both will take away material...  not a good thing.  Also, do not use any type of lubricant on the shaft or bushing (I believe the bushings are copper/bronze) and some of these products will ruin the bushings.  The kawi manuals also confirm this.  You were probably aware of this,  but sometimes the simple things can get overlooked.
Torys Vintage Sleds
Website:  torysvintagesleds.com

Tory944

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • Torys Vintage Sleds
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2014, 06:04:00 AM »
  If your buddy is running the original Mikuni "adjustable main jets (bowls)" might want to check the main jet adjustment.  The Free Air motors are finiky and I suspect he might be running rich on top.  I never liked those adjustable main jets...  Turn the screws counter clockwise and check those plugs.  Just be careful!  Also, Mercs had their fair share of stator issues.  There might be a faulty stator (high speed circuit)  sounds like your low speed is fine.  Merc advertises their 440 F/A's at 65 hp and their 76' 340 liquids at 65 hp.  Kevin with popatop racing has dynoed stock 76' 340 S/T's at low to mid 70's.  Those liquids seem to be pushing out higher ratings than their advertised rating.  I believe the 440 liquids are in the mid 80's.  Look at the numbers.....         

                                                                      75' F/A S/T 440    65 H.P.    (365 lbs)
                                                                       76' Liquid 340/440   73 H.P/85 H.P     (330 lbs)
                                                                   78-81 Invader 440     65-68 H.P   (390-400lbs)

                                                                                               ....   then you have your gearing.  Now you can understand why those Liquid S/T's are tough to beat.

                                                                                   
Torys Vintage Sleds
Website:  torysvintagesleds.com

gixxer6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2014, 07:47:22 AM »
Here is some info from the parts interchange post (http://kawasakitrax.com/kawiforum/index.php?topic=11.0):

Renumbered Kawasaki Parts that are still available from a dealer:

Bushing 25x28x30 old pn# 92028-3004, new pn# 92028-1514

gixxer6

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1566
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2014, 07:49:11 AM »
  If your buddy is running the original Mikuni "adjustable main jets (bowls)" might want to check the main jet adjustment.  The Free Air motors are finiky and I suspect he might be running rich on top.  I never liked those adjustable main jets...  Turn the screws counter clockwise and check those plugs.  Just be careful!  Also, Mercs had their fair share of stator issues.  There might be a faulty stator (high speed circuit)  sounds like your low speed is fine.  Merc advertises their 440 F/A's at 65 hp and their 76' 340 liquids at 65 hp.  Kevin with popatop racing has dynoed stock 76' 340 S/T's at low to mid 70's.  Those liquids seem to be pushing out higher ratings than their advertised rating.  I believe the 440 liquids are in the mid 80's.  Look at the numbers.....         

                                                                      75' F/A S/T 440    65 H.P.    (365 lbs)
                                                                       76' Liquid 340/440   73 H.P/85 H.P     (330 lbs)
                                                                   78-81 Invader 440     65-68 H.P   (390-400lbs)

                                                                                               ....   then you have your gearing.  Now you can understand why those Liquid S/T's are tough to beat.

                                                                                   

How is the 440 liquid 35 lbs lighter than the F/A?  It seems to good to be true...  Did they have a different chassis?

kawhead

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 524
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2014, 08:20:57 AM »
76 twisters were a different chassis than 75....merc caught everbody with their pants down in 76...great year to be a dealer, then in 77 no sleds, wtf? :o

Tory944

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 624
    • Torys Vintage Sleds
Re: 79 Invader secondary bushing ?
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2014, 04:14:26 PM »
...76' Twisters run factory aluminum skis...  102" skid/track cleated, small gas tank, no gauges except tach, etc.  It doesn't take many lightweight parts to add up to 35 lb weight savings.   Just throw a set of factory steel skis from a 75' F/A on the scale and compare the weight to the 76' shortie aluminum...  you're gonna loose at least 10 lbs right there.  The 76' 340 liquid I play with will just about rip your arms off out of the hole...  you better be holding on and leaning over the front.  Many of the 76' S/T's have rear tunnel damage from big holeshots and limited stud clearance.
Torys Vintage Sleds
Website:  torysvintagesleds.com