Author Topic: Is there a difference between the 78 and 79 suspension?  (Read 3955 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

SySteMAtiC72

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 23
Is there a difference between the 78 and 79 suspension?
« on: November 28, 2015, 09:32:34 AM »
The first photo is the suspension off my 79 Invader and the second photo is the style on both my 78's. Is there a big difference between the handling of the two or does it come down to easier adjustment?


rminier

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 507
Re: Is there a difference between the 78 and 79 suspension?
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2015, 11:41:22 AM »
 I think the design, handling, etc. were pretty much the same between those 2 model years. I think Kawasaki just changed the front spring adjustment design just to make it a little simpler and easier. The shape of the ramp that the spring rests in for the 79 skid did provide a more progressive spring rate as opposed to a more linear rate of spring compression on the 78 skid.
 In fact, I seem to remember some mention of this in the brochure for the new 79 models...this new design at the front of the skid added a progressive spring rate to the front end, like the progressive rate offered by the clever coil over shock and bell crank design for the back end of the skid.
 I doubt that this change to the front spring made any huge difference. Far more important to the ride was the rear spring set-up...which is the same 78---79.
« Last Edit: November 28, 2015, 12:11:10 PM by rminier »
75 SnoJet Astro SS, 79 Kawasaki Invader 440 (two of them), 81 Scorpion Sidewinder, 82 Blizzard 9500, 83 Yamaha Vmax 540, 97 MXZ 670....and holding...for now.